▲ 627 ▼ They must be the easiest people to scam (thelemmy.club) submitted 5 months ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca 121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social -20 points 5 months ago (3 children) Reminds me of people who proclaim AI can't code for shit. I wonder if they've used Claude or Codex in the last ~3 months. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 child) Amazon Holds Mandatory Meeting After Vibe-Code Triggered Major Outages ~ Mar 11, 2026 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] syreus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Knockout permalink fedilink source parent [–] d15d@feddit.org 12 points 5 months ago (2 children) I have and while it seems to be doing a decent job at things I'm bad at it is far from usable for the things i'm actually good at permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago Which is often a sign for something not being good at anything, only you not being good at assessing something you don't have expertise in. See also: journalism about events you've actually participated in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social -13 points 5 months ago Yes exactly. At least for now, use the AI for things you are not expert at. I suck at graphic design so I get nanobanana to do that for me. For simple bugs or creating testcases or easy to describe new features, Codex does it because it does a good job 85%+ of the time saving me a lot. For really complex race conditions or vast complex enterprise applications... I'm literally an expert at debugging, a minority of human practitioners are better than me. Ofc I do that myself. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Whilst I've not used those tools, I've used their competitors and they constantly hallucinate methods, parameters, and write pointless unit tests (as in mock a return value and then test for that return value). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago 4.5 kind of changed everything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 child) Amazon Holds Mandatory Meeting After Vibe-Code Triggered Major Outages ~ Mar 11, 2026 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] syreus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Knockout permalink fedilink source parent
[–] d15d@feddit.org 12 points 5 months ago (2 children) I have and while it seems to be doing a decent job at things I'm bad at it is far from usable for the things i'm actually good at permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago Which is often a sign for something not being good at anything, only you not being good at assessing something you don't have expertise in. See also: journalism about events you've actually participated in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social -13 points 5 months ago Yes exactly. At least for now, use the AI for things you are not expert at. I suck at graphic design so I get nanobanana to do that for me. For simple bugs or creating testcases or easy to describe new features, Codex does it because it does a good job 85%+ of the time saving me a lot. For really complex race conditions or vast complex enterprise applications... I'm literally an expert at debugging, a minority of human practitioners are better than me. Ofc I do that myself. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago Which is often a sign for something not being good at anything, only you not being good at assessing something you don't have expertise in. See also: journalism about events you've actually participated in. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social -13 points 5 months ago Yes exactly. At least for now, use the AI for things you are not expert at. I suck at graphic design so I get nanobanana to do that for me. For simple bugs or creating testcases or easy to describe new features, Codex does it because it does a good job 85%+ of the time saving me a lot. For really complex race conditions or vast complex enterprise applications... I'm literally an expert at debugging, a minority of human practitioners are better than me. Ofc I do that myself. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Whilst I've not used those tools, I've used their competitors and they constantly hallucinate methods, parameters, and write pointless unit tests (as in mock a return value and then test for that return value). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago 4.5 kind of changed everything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago 4.5 kind of changed everything. permalink fedilink source parent