310
submitted 2 weeks ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

No one gave a shit that his family were innocent bystanders. Why should he care that these victims were. The people making the decisions are wrapped in layers of security. These people are why they have the power to make those decisions.

I'm not defending violence, but it does make more sense than you give it credit for. In the end violence will only breed more violence, but when your reason to care is gone,, when justice is never coming for the guilty, people will take their vengeance out wherever they can reach.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not defending violence

But you literally are, though.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, I'm saying it's rational. I'm not suggesting it's right. It doesn't solve anything, killing more people won't bring his family back and ultimately will only justify more violence. It's an embrace of nihilism by someone who has nothing left to care about but petty vengeance.

What I'm saying is, if you start from the assumption nothing matters, then it is perfectly reasonable. I reject the premise, but the conclusion is logical for someone who doesn't. Strip a person of everything that matters to them, and they have no reason not to seek the cold comfort of vengeance against whomever they can access.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's quite literally NOT RATIONAL to attack other Innocents for revenge of the death of Innocents.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

There is, if it hurts those who are not so innocent.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

No.

If you want to hurt the not innocent, then hurt those people directly. Not other Innocents. Anyone who thinks otherwise is human shit.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Again, I don't disagree that it's wrong. I disagree that it's irrational. Words mean things.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

They do. Not the things you're trying to claim.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

When a foreign nation drops bombs that kill your family, the proper response is to write a letter to the editor, or perhaps boycott products from the nation that killed everyone you love. I simply can't understand why this guy didn't write that letter and announce his boycott. So illogical.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's quite the strawman you've constructed.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
310 points (99.1% liked)

World News

55182 readers
2601 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS