you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Idk man, I really hate what US Christians are doing right now, but I don't think shooting up a random church is going to fix anything. If this shithead wanted to take out his sorrow on someone, he should have headed to DC to attack someone actually culpable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    No one gave a shit that his family were innocent bystanders. Why should he care that these victims were. The people making the decisions are wrapped in layers of security. These people are why they have the power to make those decisions.

    I'm not defending violence, but it does make more sense than you give it credit for. In the end violence will only breed more violence, but when your reason to care is gone,, when justice is never coming for the guilty, people will take their vengeance out wherever they can reach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    I'm not defending violence

    But you literally are, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    No, I'm saying it's rational. I'm not suggesting it's right. It doesn't solve anything, killing more people won't bring his family back and ultimately will only justify more violence. It's an embrace of nihilism by someone who has nothing left to care about but petty vengeance.

    What I'm saying is, if you start from the assumption nothing matters, then it is perfectly reasonable. I reject the premise, but the conclusion is logical for someone who doesn't. Strip a person of everything that matters to them, and they have no reason not to seek the cold comfort of vengeance against whomever they can access.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    It's quite literally NOT RATIONAL to attack other Innocents for revenge of the death of Innocents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    There is, if it hurts those who are not so innocent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    No.

    If you want to hurt the not innocent, then hurt those people directly. Not other Innocents. Anyone who thinks otherwise is human shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    When a foreign nation drops bombs that kill your family, the proper response is to write a letter to the editor, or perhaps boycott products from the nation that killed everyone you love. I simply can't understand why this guy didn't write that letter and announce his boycott. So illogical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment