you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 6 months ago (12 children)

They already banning books in USA... 

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 6 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You just said there's no banned books and then said there's banned books.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Its hair splitting. Libraries are controlled by a variety of institutions, sometimes non-profits or municipalities. The 1st amendment prevents the federal government from banning protected speech, but private entities can do what they like. (like moderators on a forum).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's the thing tho, they are doing these bannings at low level places like those to get those books already out of as many places as they can while maintaining a veil of legitimacy as they haven't done in a national level, therefore they aren't "banning bonds" just like you're argumentive, but the effect is not too dissimilar from banning them at a federal level, less people are getting access to critical information that allows them to learn of how evil the government has been and currently is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment