you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 181 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (28 children)

I don't understand how they cant see that once we leave we leave. If you bite into that and hate it; its a cycle broken and we we unlikely to trust the product ever again.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 7 months ago

    It's what happened with Bassets Winegums. Used to be my absolute favourite candy. Wife came back from the UK with a box,I opened it and the taste was... Different. Googled - turns out they changed the recipe after being purchased by some large conglomerate. I haven't had one of their candies since 13 years ago. Fucking idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (15 children)

    Well if they all do it, who are ya gonna run to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The thing is, they won't ALL do it. The big names will. Real chocolate will become more of a luxury thing you have less often (which, to be fair is probably a good thing) and the established brands might survive on some blind brand loyalty, or die out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    You’re using the future tense but this is pretty much the way it already is. No one considers hersheys good chocolate. It’s getting slightly worse and people are acting like some goddess has been kicked off her pedestal. Its more like a dead dog has just had one more fly land on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Not eating candy is always an option for adults with an ounce of self control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Well swish swish. Even those with an ounce of self control sometimes also allow themselves an ounce of enjoyment. You should try it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    There are plenty of companies still selling actual chocolate, and since it's chocolate and not chocolate-flavoured sweets I think it'll just become smaller and/or more expensive. Which is fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The New Coke fiasco begs to differ.

    The cynic in me imagines that they switch away from real chocolate, everyone will hate it, they'll release a new product line that proclaims it uses real chocolate, but charge a premium for it, and people will buy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    What premium am I paying for any Coke vs. other name brand soda?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I don't understand the question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    Ah, okay, you're putting two points together.

    I think people came back to original Coke because they were looking for a specific flavor. When they had no reason to buy Coke, their options were limited - buy what they can get, or stop drinking colas. I kept on with Coke, but was happy when they changed back. As an older person now, I'd make a different choice.

    As for quality vs. taste people will buy what they find acceptable for the price, with a minimum standard that is generally very individual. This has been the case for a very long time, and cocoa is pretty expensive. It isn't surprising that some people will pay more and higher quantities of expensive ingredients lead to a more expensive product. Toss in inflation, and here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I think we’re talking about very old brands that sell in big numbers because they’ve locked in grocery store shelf space and Halloween combo bag deals. It’s not like every sale is made after a careful taste test.

    Boomers with practically no taste buds left will still buy these to hand out to trick or treaters because they remember them being good 40 years ago. Meanwhile the manufacturer can add millions in profit by shaving costs here and there, because they operate at such huge volume. Their brand is mature and their market is saturated. They can’t really grow sales anymore so all they can do to juice profits is cut costs.

    I’m not justifying their way of thinking, just saying this is why they don’t behave as if every single candy must taste amazing. Their profits keep chugging without that. And if you aren’t growing profits, you’re dead. So blame capitalism for the underlying reasons for why they can’t just leave well enough alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Stupidity and short term money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm sure they tested the new recipe on a sample audience long before they put it into mass production which informed them that the recipe change would positively impact their bottom line. Big companies don't make enormous blunders which put them out of business. The social media tech companies we all hate are still around and have billions of users after all the crap they did. Why? Because all of the negative changes they made to their platforms were first tested on a sample of users and the sample kept using it. After all of the recipe downgrades and shrinkflation, you still see the products on the shelves. The only time you ever see an established brand suddenly vanish is when they're bought out by private equity or they're made obsolete by new technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    All good points bit missing mine: brands vanish all the time. Companies too.

    It's just that short term money is valued, thats how we run today. It's never about long term services and products.

  • source
  • parent