Crozekiel comments on Lutris is AI slop now

submitted 6 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

203 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 37 points 6 months ago (10 children)

I always found Lutris to be troublesome at best. Always had better luck with Bottles.

From reading the posted threads the Lutris devs have even bigger red flags, the AI usage seems like just another symptom of their total disdain for the users of their program.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 10 child comments

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 5 points 6 months ago

It’s just painful to use. Why are commonly used Wine/Proton features like DLL overrides so unnecessarily poorly done in the UI? I may as well write the command line switches myself.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

For real, strycore's responses to github issues seem to mostly be laughing at the posters, calling them idiots, and at best eventually giving in and fixing an issue after another maintainer acknowledges a bug as valid. Glad I only use Lutris for Battle.net, and definitely looking for alternatives.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 1 point 6 months ago

I just added Battle.net as a "non-steam game" in steam and run it from there under Proton. That seemed to give me the least amount of trouble. It does come with the downside of steam always reporting "Crozekiel is currently playing Battle.net Launcher" unless I go invisible on the friend's list.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent