589
Lutris is AI slop now (thelemmy.club)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
203 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I don't believe this is true. Do you have a source for that claim?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Sure, here is the official guidance: https://kernel.org/doc/html//next/process/coding-assistants.html

    And here is a search that finds some of the AI commits: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Atorvalds%2Flinux+%22Assisted-by%22&type=commits

    And here is an interview with Linus Torvalds, where he says he's a huge believer in AI and explains how it makes work on the kernel easier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-_8YliVS4E

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Thank for that. Doesn't seem to be very widespread at present…BTW some of those results in the GH search aren't AI commits, they're either solutions based on a problem found by an AI reviewing tool or the assistant is someone's personal bundle of scripts (aka gkh_clanker_2000).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent