589
Lutris is AI slop now (thelemmy.club)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
203 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 6 months ago (12 children)

I'm going to assume from the part where they say they were at their lowest that the option the saw infront of them wasn't "code with AI or not" but rather "burnout and don't code, or code with AI". And they chose to make progress using the crutch rather than stop. That's my guess.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [+] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 43 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    most writers don't get growing stacks of bug reports. open source burnout is extremely common, unfortunately.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Like, I agree with you about open source burnout, but it feels weird to make it a dick measuring contest with writers, as a writer myself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    writers are arguably suffering more. not because llms can replace them at all to the degree they can junior programmers, but because the people making the decisions believe they can.

    also, i wasn't the one who brought it up :P

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    LLMs also aren't good at replacing junior programmers, but the people in charge believe that they can do that too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    well they are, in that they produce bad code that has to be vetted thoroughly and they don't know git.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You didn't bring it up but you're the one who implied it was a contest of who suffers more. Your comment was worded very much in a way that made it sound like they had it worse than writers, when the original commenter was just stating that all creatives experience burnout (not a comparison)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    it wasn't really about suffering more, the point was that it's more out in the open and more directly connecting with people. i'm sure andy weir had the same issues with the martian since it was written in public.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    yeah that's what's bugging me about all this. "remember the human" is even more important now.

    regarding introducing new bugs, both high-profile cases from this past week have been seasoned developers of tools with extensive test suites that claimed to have tested everything thoroughly. when someone with 30 years of experience say they've tested something, i tend to trust that judgement. but on the other hand we've also seen the cognitive decline heavy llm usage seems to lead to...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent