Genuinely dont have anything to say. Not that I agree or disagree but I just wanna see everyone else's opinions first
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
I'll take a look at it myself, but is the heritage foundation really that great of a source?
the heritage foundation has given us bourgeois class conscious bangers like “Why The Marcos Opposition Challenges The United States”
It is true that the Heritage Foundation, being quasi-fascist troop-worshippers, have their own motives for promoting a class-collaborationist and prosperous image of the military, however we judge their study on its merits rather than the inconvenience of its results.
Its addressed in the article.
yup
For reporting on shit like the wealth of troops, troop-related shit and other hog-feed like that? Sure. On China or other enemies of the state department? Probably not, it's best to apply that sort of thinking for any news agency. It's like dismissing everything off the Grayzone because of one or two bad editors/writers.
I feel like comparing the heritage foundation to the grayzone is a bit disingenuous but I guess I get your point
I'm using it as a personal example, to be honest. I've met leftcoms who do the same shit with grayzone. It's easy to disingenuous by just dismissing news organizations we don't like instead of looking at what they're saying and writing critically.