Genuinely dont have anything to say. Not that I agree or disagree but I just wanna see everyone else's opinions first

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

For reporting on shit like the wealth of troops, troop-related shit and other hog-feed like that? Sure. On China or other enemies of the state department? Probably not, it's best to apply that sort of thinking for any news agency. It's like dismissing everything off the Grayzone because of one or two bad editors/writers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I feel like comparing the heritage foundation to the grayzone is a bit disingenuous but I guess I get your point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    I'm using it as a personal example, to be honest. I've met leftcoms who do the same shit with grayzone. It's easy to disingenuous by just dismissing news organizations we don't like instead of looking at what they're saying and writing critically.

  • source
  • parent