Serious purity testing here. What he actually says:

1. When questioned about 2 specific incidences of trans women competing in womens sports by Charlie Kirk (which were likely cherrypicked to highlight potential unfair advantages), he agreed that those 2 specific incidents sounded unfair.
2. Notes that Democrats need to accept some nuance on the issue of trans women in women's sports.
3. Believes that Dems need to refocus on kitchen table issues which resonate with average voters, rather than getting sucked into arguments about pronouns with Republicans that alienate average voters.

This all seems very reasonable and fine. I'd vote for him.