121
Be Wary of Bluesky (kevinak.se)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm not the author, just sharing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm sorry, but it's like you haven't read the post:

But every counter-argument to the concerns above rests on the same foundation: technically, users can leave. Technically, you can self-host. Technically, you can run your own relay. The capability exists at every layer. But people don't do these things. They never have with any protocol. Not email, not RSS, not XMPP. The default wins. Always.

It is always technically possible to do differently. It's computers after all: anything can be coded. And most people won't because they have their life to live. What matters is the default, and all the incentives point to the default being shittier as time goes on.

The most crucial point is the relay. Yes, appviews can work without, but then you miss everything that is happening which is probably the number one reason people go to bluesky rather than the fedi. Relays are a fundamental part of what makes bluesky attractive and they require large capital to run and maintain, so it all points to bluesky still running the main one that most will connect to

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    It costs $34 a month for an experiment. It doesn't cost anywhere near that for a node that is running, used by thousands/millions of people, ingesting millions of pdses. Don't be misled by a nice experiment. You need servers, backups, people to run that. See what real world deployment looks like: a little bit under 100k a year for the only independent full stack.

    There's no need to self host as there's already public third party instances you can switch to.

    Yes it's possible. It's just not the default. That's the issue

    it's not something the fediverse is immune to either.

    true, although no one said the contrary

    This is just incorrect. RSS is probably one of the least centralised protocols right now, it's not even federated, which makes me question why the author even included it as an example

    The argument isn't whether something exists, it's what people use: rss is amazing but it's far from being mainstream. The default path to following isn't rss, which is the point (and the problem).

    It's not an argument against federation. It's an argument to look beyond the niceness of a tech.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •