61
Open source license that doesn’t allow your code to be used for AI data training? (feddit.online)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/opensource@programming.dev
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Does a license like this exist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Some authors typed the first few sentences of their book and the LLM spit out the rest.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That generally only happens in cases of overfitting, where the model was trained on a poorly de-duplicated data set that contains many copies of that book (or excerpts, quotes, and so forth). This is considered a flaw by AI trainers and a lot of work goes into sanitizing the training data to prevent it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    But you're otherwise disgusted by the fact that material is plagiarized without consent to begin with...

    ...Right, FaceDeer?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago

    You went digging through my Reddit comments to find a two-month-old thread, that must have taken a lot of effort. But I'm afraid I don't see what the relevance of it is, aside from a general "it's about AI". The bulk of the comments I wrote there were about water usage.

    I'm genuinely puzzled. Are you saying that deduplicating data is "hiding unethical behaviour?" It's actually intended for improving the model's performance, having a model spit out exact copies of its training data means you've produced a hugely expensive and wasteful re-implementation of copy-and-paste rather than a generative AI. The whole point of generative AI is to produce novel outputs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent