▲ 61 ▼ Open source license that doesn’t allow your code to be used for AI data training? (feddit.online) submitted 6 months ago by cat_fishing@feddit.online to c/opensource@programming.dev 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments Does a license like this exist?
[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) But you're otherwise disgusted by the fact that material is plagiarized without consent to begin with... ...Right, FaceDeer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 6 months ago You went digging through my Reddit comments to find a two-month-old thread, that must have taken a lot of effort. But I'm afraid I don't see what the relevance of it is, aside from a general "it's about AI". The bulk of the comments I wrote there were about water usage. I'm genuinely puzzled. Are you saying that deduplicating data is "hiding unethical behaviour?" It's actually intended for improving the model's performance, having a model spit out exact copies of its training data means you've produced a hugely expensive and wasteful re-implementation of copy-and-paste rather than a generative AI. The whole point of generative AI is to produce novel outputs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 6 months ago You went digging through my Reddit comments to find a two-month-old thread, that must have taken a lot of effort. But I'm afraid I don't see what the relevance of it is, aside from a general "it's about AI". The bulk of the comments I wrote there were about water usage. I'm genuinely puzzled. Are you saying that deduplicating data is "hiding unethical behaviour?" It's actually intended for improving the model's performance, having a model spit out exact copies of its training data means you've produced a hugely expensive and wasteful re-implementation of copy-and-paste rather than a generative AI. The whole point of generative AI is to produce novel outputs. permalink fedilink source parent