You mean the outdated charter that has since been replaced to clarify opposition to the settler colonial state, rather than Jews as a whole?

And there it is the Zionist blood libel against Palestinians and repeat of genocide propaganda.

it literally being in the charter of Hamas to destroy all Jewish people in Israel

The one you are referring to is the 1988 one written 50 years ago that immediately became irrelevant just a few years after it was written. It was and has been irrelevant since basically the beginning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Hamas_charter

While the 1988 Hamas Charter had been widely criticized for its antisemitism, the 2017 document removed the antisemitic language and stated that Hamas' fight was not with Jews as such because of their religion but with the "Zionist project."When asked, Hamas leaders explained that "The original charter has now become a historical document and part of an earlier stage in our evolution. It will remain in the movement's bookshelf as a record of our past."

edit: if it's not clear, my tone isn't meant to be debate or assholeish but genuine correction on that point, i just noticed that specific part from this thread and wanted to correct the record

You are trying to reduce my argument to one dimension that “sounds” reasonable, while ignoring things like it literally being in the charter of Hamas to destroy all Jewish people in Israel.

How surprising, you're doing Hasbara. The charter was irrelevant soon after it was written, Hamas changed many times very quickly throughout its history, and the charter you're referring to was in fact literally replaced with a new one in 2017. You are a zionist.

And you’re going to say it is the prerogative of Palestinians to fight back, and again I would completely agree with you.

No, you wouldn't and you didn't. The trick of "fighting back is their right but they're doing it wrong" isn't fooling anyone.