If how exactly it's implemented matters, regardless of similarity in internal dynamics and states, and there's an imminent tangibility to it like rain or torque, I think you're actually talking about a soul.

Behaviorally, analog systems are not substrate dependent. The same second-order differential equations describes RLC circuits, audio resonators and a ball on a spring, for example.

Analog AI chips exist, FWIW.

If you're looking at complexity theory, I'm pretty sure all physics is in EXPTIME. That's a strong class, which is why we haven't solved every problem, but it's still digital and there's stronger ones that can come up, like with Presburger arithmetic. Weird fundamentally-continuous problems exist, and there was a pretty significant result in theoretical quantum computer science about it this decade, but actual known physics is very "nice" in a lot of ways. And yes, that includes having numerical approximations to an arbitrary degree of precision.

To be clear, there's still a lot of problems with the technology, even if it can replace a graphics designer. Your screenshot is a great example of hallucination (particularly the bit about practical situations), or just echoing back a sentiment that was given.