What vibes do you think I'm going off?

What I meant was that you read the comments, identified inconsistencies from your point of view, and then responded in a confrontational manner without including the whole context.

You do have some good points. But instead of opposing everything that has been said, you could have differentiated much better.

For example:

• Public repositories on github.com are definitely used for AI training
• Private repositories on github.com are suspected of being used for training
• Github Enterprise Cloud is probably contractually protected
• Github Enterprise Server is the most secure of all options due to contracts and self-hosting (and therefore the only valid best option for enterprises with proprietary code)

All of the responses are saying that Github reads all code.

The first comment explicitly mentions "hosted on GitHub", which at least excludes GitHub Enterprise Server, which is self-hosted.

The article is about an open source project that, by definition, uses public repositories.

Github public and Github enterprise are products of the same organisation.

Coming from someone who tells others that they first need to deal with "adult life", I find this statement surprising. I work for an international company and manage several Github orgas with hundreds of repos. Whether the code is stored on github.com or on our own Github Enterprise server is highly relevant and makes a huge difference.

Dude AI companies do not give a fuck about the law. It's hard to prove a specific piece of data was used to train a model so they put everything in they can. There's literally a lawsuit about this, where Microsoft and others claim using code on GitHub to train is fair use.

As far as I can tell this lawsuit is about copyright infringement of open source code, but as we where talking about an open source project leaving GitHub because of this, that's what's relevant.

I myself would not be surprised if they could not withstand the urge to put more high quality code from enterprise users into their training data, but as they are not suing and we don't know their code, that's speculation.

Lemmy is completely unhinged on any AI topic. You can't engage rationally with these people.

They have zero evidence that any of their accusations is really happening but they'll insult and bully people over it anyway.

Who are you employed by, I wonder?