▲ 657 ▼ Scientist warn 1 billion on track to die from climate change. (www.sciencealert.com) submitted 3 years ago by Stinkywinks@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 156 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it -3 points 3 years ago (3 children) Automation replaces manual works, AI replaces intellectual ones. No need for cheap labor in the short term. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] nomecks@lemmy.world 38 points 3 years ago (3 children) You know what's in short supply right now? People who know how to automate stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 9 points 3 years ago I am at risk of losing my own job since it can be quite easily replaced by AI. The original post was about people having to die, so I hope to be counted in that number. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Wait I can get paid for that? Haha suckers my hourly rate is fucking steep. permalink fedilink source parent [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago We will automate that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 years ago (1 child) Robots cost money. Sweatshop slaves work for food. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago* (5 children) Robots don't sleep. They don't get sick. They don't have federally mandates days off. They don't commit self delete via rooftop if you overwork them. If you can be replaced by something that can do your job at 10% the speed for 1% the total cost, you will be. Such is the way of capitalist automation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 19 points 3 years ago I have never seen automation fully replace the need for human workers. You still need people to maintain the equipment. All automation does is increase the amount of output. And when you start running machines at capacity you find out real quick just how much maintenance they really need. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 years ago Robots do get sick, it's called needing maintenance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Robots also do exactly what you tell them to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago Mmmm. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sveri@lemmy.sveri.de 3 points 3 years ago Half of what you say is true. But robots are expensive, in many cases way more expensive than child labours around the world. And while it's possible to have robots do grunt work, true AI is still far away, like several decades. permalink fedilink source parent [–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The kind of sophisticated AI and robotics that can replace a human is much further away than some people seem to realize. That kind of technology doesn’t even exist in a lab. It will be decades before anything approaching that level even exists, and decades more before it’s an affordable, practical, mass-produced option. Even huge corporations that have the budget to invest won’t have the opportunity for quite a while. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago AI learns from existing human work. Without innovation it will learn nothing of value. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 38 points 3 years ago (3 children) You know what's in short supply right now? People who know how to automate stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 9 points 3 years ago I am at risk of losing my own job since it can be quite easily replaced by AI. The original post was about people having to die, so I hope to be counted in that number. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Wait I can get paid for that? Haha suckers my hourly rate is fucking steep. permalink fedilink source parent [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago We will automate that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 9 points 3 years ago I am at risk of losing my own job since it can be quite easily replaced by AI. The original post was about people having to die, so I hope to be counted in that number. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Wait I can get paid for that? Haha suckers my hourly rate is fucking steep. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago We will automate that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 years ago (1 child) Robots cost money. Sweatshop slaves work for food. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago* (5 children) Robots don't sleep. They don't get sick. They don't have federally mandates days off. They don't commit self delete via rooftop if you overwork them. If you can be replaced by something that can do your job at 10% the speed for 1% the total cost, you will be. Such is the way of capitalist automation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 19 points 3 years ago I have never seen automation fully replace the need for human workers. You still need people to maintain the equipment. All automation does is increase the amount of output. And when you start running machines at capacity you find out real quick just how much maintenance they really need. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 years ago Robots do get sick, it's called needing maintenance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Robots also do exactly what you tell them to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago Mmmm. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sveri@lemmy.sveri.de 3 points 3 years ago Half of what you say is true. But robots are expensive, in many cases way more expensive than child labours around the world. And while it's possible to have robots do grunt work, true AI is still far away, like several decades. permalink fedilink source parent [–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The kind of sophisticated AI and robotics that can replace a human is much further away than some people seem to realize. That kind of technology doesn’t even exist in a lab. It will be decades before anything approaching that level even exists, and decades more before it’s an affordable, practical, mass-produced option. Even huge corporations that have the budget to invest won’t have the opportunity for quite a while. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago* (5 children) Robots don't sleep. They don't get sick. They don't have federally mandates days off. They don't commit self delete via rooftop if you overwork them. If you can be replaced by something that can do your job at 10% the speed for 1% the total cost, you will be. Such is the way of capitalist automation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 19 points 3 years ago I have never seen automation fully replace the need for human workers. You still need people to maintain the equipment. All automation does is increase the amount of output. And when you start running machines at capacity you find out real quick just how much maintenance they really need. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 years ago Robots do get sick, it's called needing maintenance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Robots also do exactly what you tell them to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago Mmmm. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sveri@lemmy.sveri.de 3 points 3 years ago Half of what you say is true. But robots are expensive, in many cases way more expensive than child labours around the world. And while it's possible to have robots do grunt work, true AI is still far away, like several decades. permalink fedilink source parent [–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The kind of sophisticated AI and robotics that can replace a human is much further away than some people seem to realize. That kind of technology doesn’t even exist in a lab. It will be decades before anything approaching that level even exists, and decades more before it’s an affordable, practical, mass-produced option. Even huge corporations that have the budget to invest won’t have the opportunity for quite a while. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 19 points 3 years ago I have never seen automation fully replace the need for human workers. You still need people to maintain the equipment. All automation does is increase the amount of output. And when you start running machines at capacity you find out real quick just how much maintenance they really need. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 years ago Robots do get sick, it's called needing maintenance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Robots also do exactly what you tell them to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago Mmmm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sveri@lemmy.sveri.de 3 points 3 years ago Half of what you say is true. But robots are expensive, in many cases way more expensive than child labours around the world. And while it's possible to have robots do grunt work, true AI is still far away, like several decades. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The kind of sophisticated AI and robotics that can replace a human is much further away than some people seem to realize. That kind of technology doesn’t even exist in a lab. It will be decades before anything approaching that level even exists, and decades more before it’s an affordable, practical, mass-produced option. Even huge corporations that have the budget to invest won’t have the opportunity for quite a while. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago AI learns from existing human work. Without innovation it will learn nothing of value. permalink fedilink source parent