this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
156 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11 readers
1 users here now

Discuss Games, Hardware and News on PC Gaming **Discord** https://discord.gg/4bxJgkY **Mastodon** https://cupoftea.social **Donate** https://ko-fi.com/cupofteasocial **Wiki** https://www.pcgamingwiki.com

founded 1 year ago
156
Valve appear to be not willing to publish games with AI generated content (reddit.adminforge.de)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Valve quietly not publishing games that contain AI generated content if the submitters can't prove they own the rights to the assets the AI was trained on

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How bad do you feel when your phone calls are routed without a human making the connections? How terrible do you feel when your refrigerator makes ice for you for essentially free, instead of having to pay someone to get it to your door?

This is not a new thing, and it's draconian to suggest that technology be held back to keep people artificially in demand.

Your silly stance on this reminds me of an equally silly quote from the late great Douglas Adams:

I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:

  1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
  2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
  3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're comparing the current exponential growth of technology to a time where a family could afford to live off a single minimum wage income and I'm the one with the silly stance? Lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The principle doesn't change. Yes, your stance is silly. So silly that I'm guessing you're financially impacted in some way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The entire situation has changed. The factors that we are discussing and directly impact the ethics of generative AI, i.e. wealth inequality, have literally changed. You don't live in a vacuum.

And now my argument is so silly that I must be "financially impacted"? There it is, can't care about something if it doesn't affect me personally right? My income has not been affected, I'm actually a data engineer who works directly with generative AI, so I actually understand how it works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The situation is exactly the same. Technology is rendering some human labor unnecessary. Like it has many times before. Like it will many times in the future. You can gnash your teeth and beat your breast about how gosh darn unfair it is, but it won't change it, or stop it, or even slow it down.

And yes, when people take irrational, emotional stances against change, it's almost always because they have financial skin in the game.