82
Australia's first female PM has perfect response to tired anti-trans question (www.thepinknews.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 3 years ago (3 children)

TERF is literally the term they chose. They don't get to change it to something else now that people are on to their bullshit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    As a trans-inclusive radical feminist sick of radical feminism being tainted by their bullshit, I strongly disagree. Let them pick a new name showing how far they’ve strayed from the feminist ideal that biology shouldn’t determine destiny.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I hear "TERF," and my attention goes to the bit on "Trans-exclusive". Never gave the "Radical feminism" bit much thought.

    And before TERFs became a thing, it was just radical feminism. Having to modify it with "trans exclusive" suggests that inclusivity is actually the default position.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Except how often do you hear about radical feminists who aren’t TERFs anywhere in mainstream discourse? For much of the population, TERFs are the only “radical feminists” they hear about. (I reject the idea that a belief that biology is destiny as compatible with feminism in any case.). It’s not so much people in this community I worry about getting the wrong idea, it’s everywhere else.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent