▲ 83 ▼ do LLMs destroy open source? (lemmy.zip) submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by illusionist@lemmy.zip to c/opensource@lemmy.ml 34 comments fedilink hide all child comments Here and there are posts about tailwind losing its revenue stream. And then people / post authors conclude open source is lost and spread FUD. Do you think your projects die because of LLMs? I only have public hobby projects, I am not afraid. I also try to donate to a lot of free software that I use or like. E.g. this https://programming.dev/post/43810907 or https://programming.dev/post/45292081
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) But it's actually grown. It fully didn't exist 70 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 point 6 months ago It's about to not exist again so... permalink fedilink source parent [–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Neither did portable software permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Sure? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) What purpose would it serve to share the source to programs that people couldn't use? And how would they have distributed it back then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago Oh okay. But the point that it sure has grown stands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 point 6 months ago It's about to not exist again so... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Neither did portable software permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Sure? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) What purpose would it serve to share the source to programs that people couldn't use? And how would they have distributed it back then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago Oh okay. But the point that it sure has grown stands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Sure? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) What purpose would it serve to share the source to programs that people couldn't use? And how would they have distributed it back then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago Oh okay. But the point that it sure has grown stands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) What purpose would it serve to share the source to programs that people couldn't use? And how would they have distributed it back then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago Oh okay. But the point that it sure has grown stands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 months ago Oh okay. But the point that it sure has grown stands. permalink fedilink source parent