156
Valve appear to be not willing to publish games with AI generated content (reddit.adminforge.de)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/PCGaming@kbin.social
120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Valve quietly not publishing games that contain AI generated content if the submitters can't prove they own the rights to the assets the AI was trained on

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

No, that's fine - just as we understand it.

Your stance against unfettered capitalism is that - if I make some art and aomeone puts it online, some multibillion dollar games house should be able to grab it and use it in their game for free.

I can feel the capitalists quaking in their boots already. I'm sure the Reddit admins agree with you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    if I make some art and aomeone puts it online, some multibillion dollar games house should be able to grab it and use it in their game for free

    Is that what you think we're talking about, directly copying artwork? There's already laws for that, regardless of who or what creates the art. What is concerning people is that AI can be trained on other people's art and then told to create new art. It's not a copy, it's a new thing, but it used old stuff to come up with the new stuff. (humans do this too)

    I'm sure the Reddit admins agree with you.

    I don't even know what this means.

    Edit: I don't know if this needs to be said but I am not the original person you replied to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Is that what you think we're talking about, directly copying artwork?

    What I was trying to talk about is what the commenter meant by "unfettered capitalism has not, and will not work except for those already at the top." - it wasn't clear how it related to this story - but we seem to have gone off at tangent.

    AI can be trained on other people's art and then told to create new art. It's not a copy, it's a new thing, but it used old stuff to come up with the new stuff.

    Yes. It is entirely dependent on the old stuff. We have laws for that too, in terms of licences for derivative works.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    unfettered capitalism has not, and will not work except for those already at the top

    My guess is that they saw the phrase "let the market decide" and took that to mean "unfettered capitalism". But yeah, sorry about the tanget I've dragged you into, haha.

    We have laws for that too, in terms of licences for derivative works

    but they're not derivative works, at least not in how I understand the term. They're entirely new works.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent