▲ 1028 ▼ Majority of CEOs Alarmed as AI Delivers No Financial Returns (futurism.com) submitted 7 months ago by ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social [M] to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 226 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (2 children) I hope we find a way to cure it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Luigi found a pretty good solution. But, all jokes aside, the best solution is to start taxing these fuckers as hard as possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* But, to meaningfully tax them, we need a government that they don't own. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago (3 children) What we really need is to speedrun evolution, and reach the next step sooner, where greed is no longer a factor and things are more globalistic, etc. You know, something sensible. Otherwise, it's just a cycle that repeats, even with people like Luigi appearing every now and then, and society cheering them on. The next cycle is behind the corner, at any time. We have to break the cycle with radical changes to human behavior and motivations in general. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Evolution doesn't have "steps". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago You don't have to take things so literally. Let's say it so that everyone is happy: evolution is on a spectrum That wasn't the point of my comment at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago Evolutionary changes take millennia to happen. Even if you speed run things it will still be centuries before there's a change. You could try to manually curate genetic changes, but we've tried that, it was called Eugenics and led to Nazis. What we really need to do is accept that humans are still animals, and have all kinds of flaws due to our animal natures. We need to come up with ways of accepting and working with our animal natures. Males are inevitably going to try to do things to attract female attention so that they can "mate". So, maybe try to make it so that the things that work are taking care of needy people, rather than driving a big pickup truck or shooting a gun. Or, in the case of CEOs, accumulating absurd amounts of money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) When we have the potential to reach post-scarcity, scarcity will become artificial solely for the purpose of wielding influence or expressing power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) That's the world we are already living in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Not really. There are many resources on the planet that are finite. Silicon and Helium for example. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 7 months ago They keep saying LLMs will replace jobs. Maybe we replace their jobs and just see how it goes? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Luigi found a pretty good solution. But, all jokes aside, the best solution is to start taxing these fuckers as hard as possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* But, to meaningfully tax them, we need a government that they don't own. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago (3 children) What we really need is to speedrun evolution, and reach the next step sooner, where greed is no longer a factor and things are more globalistic, etc. You know, something sensible. Otherwise, it's just a cycle that repeats, even with people like Luigi appearing every now and then, and society cheering them on. The next cycle is behind the corner, at any time. We have to break the cycle with radical changes to human behavior and motivations in general. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Evolution doesn't have "steps". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago You don't have to take things so literally. Let's say it so that everyone is happy: evolution is on a spectrum That wasn't the point of my comment at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago Evolutionary changes take millennia to happen. Even if you speed run things it will still be centuries before there's a change. You could try to manually curate genetic changes, but we've tried that, it was called Eugenics and led to Nazis. What we really need to do is accept that humans are still animals, and have all kinds of flaws due to our animal natures. We need to come up with ways of accepting and working with our animal natures. Males are inevitably going to try to do things to attract female attention so that they can "mate". So, maybe try to make it so that the things that work are taking care of needy people, rather than driving a big pickup truck or shooting a gun. Or, in the case of CEOs, accumulating absurd amounts of money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) When we have the potential to reach post-scarcity, scarcity will become artificial solely for the purpose of wielding influence or expressing power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) That's the world we are already living in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Not really. There are many resources on the planet that are finite. Silicon and Helium for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* But, to meaningfully tax them, we need a government that they don't own. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago (3 children) What we really need is to speedrun evolution, and reach the next step sooner, where greed is no longer a factor and things are more globalistic, etc. You know, something sensible. Otherwise, it's just a cycle that repeats, even with people like Luigi appearing every now and then, and society cheering them on. The next cycle is behind the corner, at any time. We have to break the cycle with radical changes to human behavior and motivations in general. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Evolution doesn't have "steps". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago You don't have to take things so literally. Let's say it so that everyone is happy: evolution is on a spectrum That wasn't the point of my comment at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago Evolutionary changes take millennia to happen. Even if you speed run things it will still be centuries before there's a change. You could try to manually curate genetic changes, but we've tried that, it was called Eugenics and led to Nazis. What we really need to do is accept that humans are still animals, and have all kinds of flaws due to our animal natures. We need to come up with ways of accepting and working with our animal natures. Males are inevitably going to try to do things to attract female attention so that they can "mate". So, maybe try to make it so that the things that work are taking care of needy people, rather than driving a big pickup truck or shooting a gun. Or, in the case of CEOs, accumulating absurd amounts of money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) When we have the potential to reach post-scarcity, scarcity will become artificial solely for the purpose of wielding influence or expressing power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) That's the world we are already living in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Not really. There are many resources on the planet that are finite. Silicon and Helium for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Evolution doesn't have "steps". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago You don't have to take things so literally. Let's say it so that everyone is happy: evolution is on a spectrum That wasn't the point of my comment at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yana_@lemmy.ml 1 point 7 months ago You don't have to take things so literally. Let's say it so that everyone is happy: evolution is on a spectrum That wasn't the point of my comment at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago Evolutionary changes take millennia to happen. Even if you speed run things it will still be centuries before there's a change. You could try to manually curate genetic changes, but we've tried that, it was called Eugenics and led to Nazis. What we really need to do is accept that humans are still animals, and have all kinds of flaws due to our animal natures. We need to come up with ways of accepting and working with our animal natures. Males are inevitably going to try to do things to attract female attention so that they can "mate". So, maybe try to make it so that the things that work are taking care of needy people, rather than driving a big pickup truck or shooting a gun. Or, in the case of CEOs, accumulating absurd amounts of money. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) When we have the potential to reach post-scarcity, scarcity will become artificial solely for the purpose of wielding influence or expressing power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) That's the world we are already living in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Not really. There are many resources on the planet that are finite. Silicon and Helium for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) That's the world we are already living in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Not really. There are many resources on the planet that are finite. Silicon and Helium for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jango_Fettish@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Not really. There are many resources on the planet that are finite. Silicon and Helium for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 7 months ago They keep saying LLMs will replace jobs. Maybe we replace their jobs and just see how it goes? permalink fedilink source parent