you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Oh good, can't have people wearing armour without a licence. They might walk around safely or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Your takeaway is that this guy was arrested for wearing armour? Interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    If you read the article, it is one of the charges, yes. Implication being that it is a crime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    And it's the one you are concentrating on.

    Why are you so interested in distracting?

    Just straight out unable to admit that a child of wealth is able to do wrong, otherwise you won't be able to claim afluenza when the time comes?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    I love you focus on that, and not that he was dealing and distributing one time use, 3D printed firearms.

    This is like JBP whining about losing his free speech, when the reality is that he just doesn't want any of the responsibilities that come with being an accredited psychologist.

  • source
  • parent