you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They don’t want to deal with the slightest risk of dealing with legal consequences. The ole corpo risk matrix + risk appetite as assessed by lawyers resulted in this, no IT involved ever probably.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Totally, corporations will always go fasch, not just because they want to¹ but because it's what they are

    But

    can't trust moderation

    There is low hanging fruit that can be procedurally verified.

    They chose this, obviously, clearly

    ¹they always want to

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    Your solution doesn’t fully eliminate risk on it’s own and addressing that costs money - that’s about as far as a rational company has to go. They know going nuclear and banning all personal info means not having to deal with it at all and it’s a niche thing that will affect negligible amount of users. Bean counting is the core of meeting regulatory and legal requirements in case of for-profit organisations.

  • source
  • parent