372
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
189 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Clair Obscur won multiple awards but used generative AI art as placeholders during production.

The Indie Game Awards revoked Clair Obscur’s Debut and Game of the Year after the AI disclosure.

IGAs reassigned the awards (Blue Prince, Sorry We’re Closed) and reignited debate on gen-AI use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's a gray zone in my opinion.

The final art will still be based on the AI (read: stolen) art. Where do you draw the line between a unique piece of art and copying existing art?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    God forbid anyone uses anyone else's art as a reference. /s

    The answer to your question is whether they drew the art/wrote the code themselves. Ie. Not tracing or just renaming variables.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent