872
I think there's an imposter amongus (mander.xyz)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 107 points 8 months ago (8 children)

You do need to do that though.

If someone wants to read further information they need the citations.

You are supposed to cite all your relevant previous works in each paper you publish.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    She probably did. But the reviewer won't know that as the paper (should) get anonymized before review. The author's own name will be censored all the way throughout the paper with certain publishers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I doubt that since the comment was a suggestion to read and cite herself. If she did cite herself the assumption would be that she did read the citations so the comment would be moot, no? Why would they suggest to cite herself if she already did?

    They only anonymize the author, not the citations right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    You are absolutely right, but how are you going to make a fire Twitter post if you can't engineer a situation like this? 🤔

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Fire twitter post that reads as incompetence to anyone who matters in their field... Yeah....

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •