you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

And it's worth remembering what decade it was written in, a lot of the older prose and pacing hasn't aged well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    If I remember right the first couple of books were originally published as a series of short stories in a sci-fi magazine and sometime later were compiled into novels. That's why the books seem a bit disjointed where they'll suddenly just jump ahead in time to some new setting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    That's just not true. I'd say it was generally better back then (and prior)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry, but I just don't agree. I love 70s sci-fi, and have aread a huge collection of weird books... But none of them have prose as good as some of the modern books, such as The Final Architecture, The Expanse, or even Red Rising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Are we just talking about sci-fi? Because it's not exactly known for having the best prose.

    I was referring more to like actual literary classics. Have you ever read Nabokov? Shit is insane, and English wasn't even his first language.

  • source
  • parent