Broadly speaking, you probably agree with the large majority of the views commonly attributed to whichever group you identify with - what are the exceptions? Something that if you mention without a caveat immediately makes people jump to conclusions or even attack you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

practical and pragmatic reforms are boring. good policy making is boring.

hence why nobody gets excited by it. it's much more exciting to sit around daydream about the revolution than get involved in community or political groups or read public policy white papers that report the cause and effect of policies in a complex manner.

I used to work in public policy. It was really cool, until you realize nobody gives a fuck about making the world better. especially the politicans. all they can about is riling people up emotionally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    all they can about is riling people up emotionally.

    Damn, this shit goes all the way to the places where people signed up for boring policy work and can make a difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    no, the policy nerds just want to to do good work. but good work isn't politically viable. they also typically aren't ideological because they are evidence-driven.

    the politicians don't care about it, all they want is soundbytes to ragebait their voters. they want the 'evidence' to proof D is good, R is bad. or vice versa.

  • source
  • parent