35
The Fediverse and Content Creation: Monetization (deadsuperhero.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [M] to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I’ve been thinking a lot recently about PeerTube, Loops, Bandwagon, and other platforms in the Fediverse that are geared around artists. I might get flamed for this, and you’re welcome to disagree, but I think the network is in dire need of having support for commerce.

Not “Big Capitalism” commerce, but the ability for people to buy and sell things, support projects, and commission their favorite creators to keep making more stuff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

Hard pass on the core concept here. I'm really enjoying a community of people just posting because they want to, it's like the internet I grew up with and loved. Why would would you want to bring in people trying to squeeze a buck out of that? Growth isn't an inherently good thing

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    I tend to agree. We won't have any "content creators" because it's so hard to monetize fedi - and that's a good thing! Instead we have people who post stuff they like and are interested in. It's far better system. No ads, no "influencing".

    However, it would be great if we could create a better model for sharing hosting costs somehow - bandwidth and servers are not cheap when serving video. Donations work to an extent, but it's always a shaky system based on kindness of select few.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent