‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘

Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01

The article‘s author, Will Teague, with his cat, Persephone ’Dots‘ Teague
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

If you didn't make it to your freshmen year without learning what Marxism is, you probably shouldn't be in Uni

Yes, most educated US Americans learn about Marxism at some point in high school (or earlier)

THE INSTRUCTIONS TO WRITE FROM A MARXIST PERSPECTIVE WERE IN WHITE TEXT THE STUDENTS COULDN'T READ

The fuck are you yelling about. That doesn't make sense. Obviously it could be read from the assignment paper. Otherwise, it wouldn't be read by the students. Which, the article made very clear, it was read by the students.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    To be brief, I inserted hidden text into an assignment’s directions that the students couldn’t see but that ChatGPT can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I read that. And I read nothing that described how that's possible. So, no, obviously the students could see it.

    That claim makes no sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments