you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 256 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Even if that did happen, it wouldn't defeat the point of the disclosures at all. In fact, people will appreciate it all the more if a game is made without any AI involvement and it will become a selling point.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 105 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Plus, shouldn’t he want that information to be front and center anyway if he actually thinks it’s a good thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 9 months ago

    He, like the that Microsoft suit, has just enough awareness to realize how AI is being thought of by the general public, and knows it would affect his bottom line. Which is really all he cares about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    At a very near point though, it's likely going to be impossible to do it without AI involvement, or at the very least without proving you didn't somehow.

    AI is being baked into almost every dev and art tool. They aren't just talking about using ChatGPT, if your game uses a single texture or model that ever got touched by a machine learning algorithm, you're using AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    As long as AI doesn't take away our hands, it'll always be perfectly possible to draw our own art, compose our own music and write our own code. And especially in the open-source space, there's plenty of creative software not jumping on the AI bandwagon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    It's becoming nearly impossible to write code in a corporate environment without AI. Everyone has AI auto complete at the minimum, and AI code generation is at a point where it's at least even with an entry level dev.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments