Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

The vote coincided with the international day for the elimination of violence against women, a day designated by the U.N. General Assembly.

The law won bipartisan support from the center-right majority and the center-left opposition in the final vote in the Lower Chamber, passing with 237 votes in favor.

The law, backed by the conservative government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy. It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

So are you guys getting less stalking, harassmentd, domestic violence and murder by your partner or are you just blowing smoke rings here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    We're no longer discussing stalking or harassment.

    We are talking about equality between different groups and what it means.

    They're trying to use "logic" to justify giving one group more than the other.

    And I'm using the same "logic" to argue the opposite.

    Simple debate, nothing more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    This isn't giving one group more than the other, it's not like you can murder men now.

    Any criticism of this law should be around the ineffectiveness of harsh punishments as a deterrent, not that it's sexist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    As if you could murder women before?

    This isn't giving one group more than the other, it's not like you can murder men now.

    And that's not what I'm arguing about.

    The other commenter said "giving more to one group doesn't take away from another" and apparently you have to have flawed logic to think otherwise.

    THAT'S what I'm arguing about. In case you didn't bother reading the comments properly...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Your "logic" is no such thing. And stop pretending your scenarios exist isolate of context. Damned fool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment