▲ 98 ▼ Zohran Mamdani calls the president of Cuba and Venezuela “dictators who have stifled free and fair elections, jaled political opponents, and suppressed the free and fair press” (lemmy.ml) submitted 9 months ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml 50 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/38725765 https://www.latintimes.com/mamdani-breaks-silence-about-maduro-cuban-president-diaz-canel-how-jorge-ramos-daughter-paola-589809
[+] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 child) What’s more, openness to mass immigration is anti labour, as it worsens the positions of the worker (cheap competition who won’t unionize because they don’t mix well with the rest of the population). Fascist, gtfo permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago Those wankers are always chanting "free movement of capital" but never "free movement of workers". They should take up drunkenly juggling chainsaws permalink fedilink source parent [–] dx1@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* Anti LOCAL labor, a crucial distinction. Not even "anti", really just decreasing their relative position, putting aside whether or not that position is already above others. So, a policy to enforce that raises the rights of one nationality above another. What do we call that? "National" "socialism"? You understand the idea of an empire pillaging the world and then trying to restrict access to the spoils? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 child) What’s more, openness to mass immigration is anti labour, as it worsens the positions of the worker (cheap competition who won’t unionize because they don’t mix well with the rest of the population). Fascist, gtfo permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago Those wankers are always chanting "free movement of capital" but never "free movement of workers". They should take up drunkenly juggling chainsaws permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago Those wankers are always chanting "free movement of capital" but never "free movement of workers". They should take up drunkenly juggling chainsaws permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dx1@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* Anti LOCAL labor, a crucial distinction. Not even "anti", really just decreasing their relative position, putting aside whether or not that position is already above others. So, a policy to enforce that raises the rights of one nationality above another. What do we call that? "National" "socialism"? You understand the idea of an empire pillaging the world and then trying to restrict access to the spoils? permalink fedilink source parent