you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 50 points 11 months ago (55 children)

Is it just me, or does that seem .. abrupt?

  • source
  • hideshow 55 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    There's time until March for the maintainers of the 3 niche architectures to organize and make rust available for them. Doesn't sound that abrupt to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (45 children)

    Rust adds another layer of trusting the compiler isn't backdoored. All UNIX/Linux systems use the gcc toolchain, so having it written in C would mean less dependencies for the OS.

    Strange times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    For package maintainers, it's reasonable to expect security updates are rolled out the same week that a vulnerability is found. If you can't deploy a new version of a package in 6 months, not maintaining the package is also a valid option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    The timeline is not super abrupt, especially for architectures where all he is asking is to ensure that your Rust toolchain is in order. That is especially true when you consider that Rust is already well maintained on all the Debian architectures that people actually use.

    The abruptness (almost rudeness) is in the second part where he basically says that, if you cannot get Rust going in time, you should just stop releasing Debian for that architecture.

    It is mostly just poorly worded though. Because none of these architectures have “official” support even now. This will not be the only way they are behind. So, there is not reason to be so dramatic.

    And that would be my response to him. Another option here is that these alternative architectures just continue to ship an older version of APT for now. Emergency avoided. Few of them ship with up-to-date versions of APT even now.

    Another solution is to use one of the multiple projects that is working to make Rust code build with the GCC compiler back-end. At least one of these projects has already announced that they want to work with these Debian variants to ensure that APT builds with them.

    So, the 6 month timeline is a reasonable impetus to make that happen which would be quite a good thing beyond just APT.

    There are many other useful tools written in Rust you are going to want to use on these architectures. It will be a fantastic outcome if this pressure from APT kickstarts that happening for some of these long abandoned architectures (by the mainstream at least).

  • source
  • parent