[I literally had this thought in the shower this morning so please don't gatekeep me lol.]

If AI was something everyone wanted or needed, it wouldn't be constantly shoved your face by every product. People would just use it.

Imagine if printers were new and every piece of software was like "Hey, I can put this on paper for you" every time you typed a word. That would be insane. Printing is a need, and when you need to print, you just print.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

it wouldn’t be pushed on us

The Internet was pushed on everyone.

Sure companies were excited to promote it, but it was primarily adopted because of a very large amount of people being excited about it.

how can it be trusted without human verification

You use Google despite no human verification. Yahoo used to function based on human curated lists.

I use DuckDuckGo to find sources, not answers. I won’t use them again if they’re trash. They’re accountable for their content.

Human curated lists are still very helpful. In a sense, that was the value of Reddit.

environmental impact

I did the math and posted it on Lemmy.

I’ll take your word for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    a very large amount of people being excited about it.

    A very large amount of people are excited by AI. People were excited by pet rocks.

    I use DuckDuckGo to find sources, not answers.

    DuckDuck is Bing with privacy. When you get a Google AI summary it lists links to read the source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    The push:excitement ratio was different for the early internet than for ai.

    Using those sources would verify the Google summary. For me, it is an unnecessary step. I can just go read the sources directly and skip the summary since I’ll need to read them anyway to verify the summary.

  • source
  • parent