▲ 1023 ▼ Linux Virus (lemmy.ml) submitted 10 months ago by cm0002@lemmings.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 132 points 10 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] witty_username@feddit.nl 84 points 10 months ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 52 points 10 months ago (1 child) Maybe they meant it's a soke permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kautau@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago no, then he would have said snapcraft permalink fedilink source parent [–] qaz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 child) But then it wouldn't be able to do anything unless they properly configured the apps permissions :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago I believe that's the joke, but I'm glad someone explained this for those that don't know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) chroot virus permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 10 months ago The no holds barred way of getting root on otherwise secure systems permalink fedilink source parent
[+] witty_username@feddit.nl 84 points 10 months ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 52 points 10 months ago (1 child) Maybe they meant it's a soke permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kautau@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago no, then he would have said snapcraft permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 52 points 10 months ago (1 child) Maybe they meant it's a soke permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kautau@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago no, then he would have said snapcraft permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago no, then he would have said snapcraft permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 child) But then it wouldn't be able to do anything unless they properly configured the apps permissions :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago I believe that's the joke, but I'm glad someone explained this for those that don't know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago I believe that's the joke, but I'm glad someone explained this for those that don't know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) chroot virus permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 10 months ago The no holds barred way of getting root on otherwise secure systems permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 10 months ago The no holds barred way of getting root on otherwise secure systems permalink fedilink source parent
