295
AI is not popular, and AI users are unpleasant asshats (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [M] to c/techtakes@awful.systems
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

science shows as true what you thought was only 99% true

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVf7VUX_iUk&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20251015-ai-is-not-popular-and-ai-users-are-unpleasant-asshats - podcast

time: 5 min 57 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

… the search engines became crap because of ai

I mean, search has always been built on some kind of LLM. That's how you convert a query into a list of page-results.

We've just started trying to wrap the outputs into a natural language response pattern in order to make them feel more definitive and more engaging. The "AI" part of search is mostly window-dressing.

Plus, ai just lies.

It has inaccurate heuristics and often tries to back-fill what it can't find with an approximation in order to maintain user engagement.

Idk if I'd even call it lying, so much as bullshitting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I mean, search has always been built on some kind of LLM. That’s how you convert a query into a list of page-results.

    no it fucking hasn’t. the stemming and page ranking algorithms used in traditional search have absolutely nothing to do with LLMs.

    shit, neither stemming nor PageRank as originally defined even have a machine learning component. here’s postgres’ full text search suite, which literally converts a textual query into a list of results (sans page ranking, which is out of scope for a database) in a manner suitable for a production search engine, utterly without any machine learning or other stochastic crap.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent