121
What's an example of something that usually goes unnoticed when done well but very noticeable when done poorly or not done at all? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 82 points 1 year ago (11 children)

CGI. When people say "there was too much CGI" they just mean "there was bad CGI" because the good stuff is imperceptible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    And often that's not because the CGI itself is bad quality, but because the effects team was asked to do the impossible with half the tools necessary. The "fix it in post" mentality.

    Even small things like having reference lighting examples from the set can be the difference between an okay outcome and something almost imperceptible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely. On the Team Deakins podcast they (Roger and his wife James) said they try to be involved in post as much as possible, because when animators and DPs don't communicate, the digital elements are lit differently and end up looking cartoonish.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    One time I worked on something where a character threw a spear. For some reason they didn't have a spear on set and asked the actor to just pretend. Then our instructions from the director were to make the actor twirl the spear before he threw it. Just because it looks super cool to twirl stuff, I guess.

    Not only did the actor not pretend to twirl it, the shot was about 30 frames long (one second is 24 frames). So we had like 15 frames to make him twirl this giant spear, which the actor didn't do. It was either make it look like dog shit or make a full, hero digital double and completely re-do the shot as 100% CGI, which there wasn't time or budget for.

    Yeah, it looked like dog shit. The whole project did.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    The reasons why CGI is bad doesn’t matter. If the CGI is bad it is bad.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'd argue it matters quite a bit. It shows producers, and by extension a studio, that can't manage production effectively, and that almost always extends to the rest of the movie. "Bad" CG is rarely the only issue with those movies, it's just what you remember most since movies in general require the suspension of disbelief and that pulls you right out of it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That the CGI is bad is what matters the most. Why it is bad changes nothing for the viewer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not sure why you are being downvoted for this. It’s true. The takeaway should be “producers shouldn’t rush their VFX and listen to time and budget projections” instead of thinking they can get something for nothing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Not sure why you are being downvoted for this

    The downvotes are probably because they're just stating something obvious. No shit, bad looking CGI looks bad, that doesn't mean the actual CGI itself is necessarily bad. Small things like wrong lighting can make otherwise great CGI look terrible. The reasons DO matter, even if the average person may not really care and just has the takeaway of "bad CGI".

    Posting that type of response is not actually providing anything to the discussion, it's a useless comment that provides no value. Not all comments and opinions are valid or constructive. The voting system is not really for agree/disagree, but whether a post adds to the discussion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent