64
Here's why people are being so mean about the Titan going down - CBC (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 3 years ago* by to c/canada@lemmy.ca
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have to say I'm not sure what they were hoping for, the discourse hasn't felt overly mean by internet standards, but maybe that's just my bubble. I'm sorry they died, but now that we know all the details it's a bit like the guy that decided to hike up a lava field last year.

Also,

People's fascination with the wealthy is fuelled by both curiosity and envy. And when rich people find themselves in trouble, it makes the rest of us feel better, Pamela Rutledge, director of the California-based Media Psychology Research Center, wrote in a piece about social media and the submersible for Psychology Today.

I feel like "outrage" should be in there somewhere. It makes me mad that people can be that dumb with a quarter of a million dollars while I'm just glad to have a safe roof over my head, and other people (like the mentioned boat migrants) aren't even that lucky.

Alright, back off my soap box.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Agreed. I don't envy them at all, in fact I think there's evidence both anecdotal and scientific that being ultra-rich fucks you up quite seriously, and/or you need to be seriously fucked up to get that way. I actually pity them, to some degree. My pity is, however, eclipsed by my anger at a world that allows them to exist, in a cycle they perpetuate.

Frankly, I suspect pamela rutledge's out-of-touch words suggest she is beholden to some of their interests. I see much less envy than I see anger at the ultra-rich.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There is a certain amount of schadenfreude when you see the ultra rich suffering some self imposed misfortune but when I see the 1% I really just think that they need to go against a wall while the collective takes their I'll gotten gains to the tax man to socially distribute to those who need with housing then mental health and healthcare followed by education and jobs in infrastructure to bring our whole society into an environmentally friendly sustainable future.

    Then again that is just a run on sentence of dreams.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    You'd be amazed at how little it takes to be in "the 1%". Going by total wealth (instead of income), the 1% is about 3.5 million dollars starting. That means your average small business owner likely qualifies as "the 1%". Again, not quite where you really want to be addressing your ire.

    The real abuse comes from, like, "the 0.1%" (starting at about 17 million) or maybe even "the 0.01%" (starting at about 78 million). And that means you're going to be eating people who have multiple homes whose wealth comes primarily from exploitative investments, abusive tax loopholes and other such shitfuckery, not people who worked their entire lives to finally own the corner store they now run.

    source: https://economics.princeton.edu/working-papers/top-wealth-in-america-new-estimates-under-heterogenous-returns/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent