you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

I've never liked arbitrary spell targeting restrictions. I say if you want to fire blindly around cover or into a fog cloud you should be able to. It doesn't come up very often and because it's easy for players to understand that they'll have a very high chance of missing and losing the spell slot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I think spells that target the spirit of a target shouldn't be able to be fired blind - that's what i would let it depend on. A cold ray doesn't need a visible target, but everything mind affecting that is not AoE will need it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago

    I actually think it’s a fair restriction for spells that require sight. It imposes a somewhat interesting limit on casters, especially since a lot of spells still do something on a miss.

  • source
  • parent