476
Cult rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/196@lemmy.world
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

I believe their identity is valid and fully support it, but see the religious connection as ridiculous. That is not to say that I have a problem with spiritual or supernatural beliefs, I just don't believe people should be indoctrinating each other and basing policy or laws on it. Basically spirituality should be something people use to work on their own issues not force those issues on other people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    You can't disentangle religion from gender in someone who has a religious gender identity. You're making the same mistake as the transphobes we have here in the west. Those transphobes think they can disentangle gender identity from sports, or from children. But gender identity touches everything and you have to respect all of it or you're not respecting any of it. You have to respect people's freedom of religion in order to respect religious genders.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I respectfully disagree. I believe that expecting NBs to be shamans/priests is the same thing as telling women to "shut up and make me a sandwich" or telling young boys to "stop crying and act like a man". it's just another societally imposed gender role.

    People have a tendency to socially isolate people who are different. Tribal communities tend to push autists and genderqueer folk into the role of shaman too. It's a phenomenon heard about during the 5 year period where I smoked way too much weed and accidentally became a certified shaman.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Yeah okay but if a trans woman says "I like being a loving wife" and you say "You're not a wife", you're not actually liberating her. Even if the social category of "wife" is damaging to those it's forced onto, you can't repair that damage by forcibly taking it away from trans people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm not saying that, I'm saying "tradwife" isn't a gender identity. It can a be a valid part of someone's identity and one traditionally associated with being a woman. it's just a chosen aspect of their identity. Gender isn't a choice and tying it to professions and societal expectations isn't healthy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    I didn't say tradwife, I said wife. Wife is a gender identity, and it's also a social role. Things can be both and you can't take them away from people who want them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We're clearly not going to come to any meaningful consensus. So I don't think continuing to argue is in either of our interests. I would always refer to terms like wife and husband as an expression of gender identity rather than the gender identity itself. But if you define things differently that's fine. My education is in neuroscience so I think of gender as being hard wired into our brains and universal across cultures. Any chosen labels I would regard as expressions of gender rather than Inherently part of it. And something I'll gladly leave to psychologists and anthropologists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    The obvious sensitive period for the development of gender identity is the round of synaptic pruning around 18 months after birth. Gender is way too complex and malleable to be structured by proliferation and migration. It's structured by synaptic pruning, which mostly occurs after birth.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Interesting, everything I've read has indicated that it's largely set due to testosterone concentration prior to the development of the gonads in utero. I'd be interested to read some of the research about the association with synaptic pruning though, if you have a couple of links? It makes sense that children would begin recognising it then, because it's about that time they start developing a concept of self.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Have a read of Infants' Intermodal Knowledge About Gender (Poulin-Dubois, 1994) and Patterns of Gender Development (Martin & Ruble, 2010). Infants can't recognise gender in others or in themselves. Toddlers at 18 months can.

    The way I see it, gender is probably like phoneme recognition. Infants can recognise the phonemes of all languages. During synaptic pruning, they specialise into the phonemes of the languages spoken in their home. Gender identity needs to specialise for the culture it's developed in, just like phoneme recognition. People need to develop a culturally appropriate identification with masculinity/femininity/other so they can achieve social status and attract a good mate. Identifying with trucks and baseball won't help men's fitness in feudal Japan. Calligraphy skills won't help men's fitness in 20th century America. Gender identity needs to be adaptive and context-responsive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent