I can understand being hopeful for something greater taking it's place post-collapse, but why wish a downfall for an entire team of humans that feel pain just as much as you and I?

Imagine if we referred to the recent UN walkout as "Drama at the UN." It trivializes the topic.

Most people when they hear "drama" they think things like the brain dead hissy fits on reality TV. The kind of pointless fighting we should avoid. Destigmatizing the word would legitimatize that stuff.

We really need a better word for this posts topic where there's very public back and forth but it's a much more valid moral disagreement.

How is taking direct action to stigmatize someone who is enabling our fascist military “slacktivism”? What do you propose would be a more fitting and effective tactic for someone who doesn’t want their work associated in any way to the US military?

I mean yeah, if you ask a fascist how they feel about fascism, they probably don't think it's a big deal.

That's the thing, whether or not they're valid depends on the person you're asking.

No it fucking doesn't! There are people who think that, but they're wrong.

Moral relativism is bullshit.

The problem is, even if he was a good guy, he will get pressure from the racist regime if they want some changes. They could threaten his career of family, and so he complies

So...you don't believe in democracy? That people involved, stakeholders, don't have a right to influence the direction of an organized effort?