you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

Here's the IAEA report: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf

The discharge limit for tritium is pre-defined in the Government Policy for discharges of ALPS treated water as 22 TBq per year, which is equivalent to the pre-accident discharge limits at FDNPS.

I'm also curious about how much discharge nuclear generators normally produce. If they discharge a certain amount as part of normal operation then it seems to me to also become a function of how many nuclear generators are being operated globally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Hasn’t got anything to do with this release. Clearly radiative material was received during the accident. That will have made it into the food chain and some fish living near plant will have absorbed some.

    This release is about the gradual release of treated water which is measured to be below the existing limit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments