If only they would put their money where their mouth is and support some opposition candidates. But that would be political and not what “stockholders” want from them.
Why is it that we have CEO’s as leaders when they don’t lead anything?
If only they would put their money where their mouth is and support some opposition candidates. But that would be political and not what “stockholders” want from them.
Why is it that we have CEO’s as leaders when they don’t lead anything?