you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Codeberg has a git "ci" possibility (woodpecker?). What is missing?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Not all actions run on it.

    Also, GitHub infrastructure is free and really performance, that's why I use it even if I have my own for server.

    Also, discoverability. For the projects that I want to show to the world, GitHub is best, since it's most likely people see it there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Free like in Microsoft free...

    For the discoverability I totally understand, but it's a behemoth, it should be split up IMO.

    On a side note, I have never had any performance problems with Codeberg, but my projects aren't that big.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Selfhosted ci works well, but the GitHub ci is so fast it's not even funny. At least compared to my selfhosted stuff which is arguably cheap

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments