you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I disagree. Soviets were busy recovering from WW2 for decades while funding own allies. They were not in the position to splurge on non necessities.

But even with that - they supplied entire population with oil, gas, electric no problems. Utilities barely cost anything even in modern russia

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    In the USSR, private plots owned by collective farm families, averaging 0.25 hectares in area, provided 30% of meat, vegetables and milk, 33% of eggs, and 59% of potatoes in 1979.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Bet the land was taken better care of when its a family that owns it compared to some minimum wage workers hired by a mega farm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yes, although I was referring to the fact that every experiment in collectivized agriculture in the 20th century boils down to: A minuscule percentage of the plots were left to private initiative and those plots account for the majority of the total output.

  • source
  • parent