you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

Oh just as a tiebreaker. Interesting.

Personally I don’t support any electoral system where leaders have any more or less voting power than the votes they receive, so I’m not sure how that would be workable in your system. For example, the outlying group would have way more electoral power per person if each leader gets one vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The vote is for cooperation between executive branches, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the Regional Houses, Courts, or the National Senate would agree to cooperate with executives. In any case, there is a 4th President - the Outer Region, which consists of Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Djibuti, and other small yet significant territories. I am of the mind that with a lack of raw land and people, the Outer Regions should get some sort of outsized advantage to compensate. A president's vote being equal to their peers is probably simple enough to do the trick.

  • source
  • parent