▲ 271 ▼ Debian 13 burning 10W playing 4K YouTube video on a Framework with max brightness 🫨 (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by lightrush@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml 63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) This is why Backports exists. You can get any newer packages or kernels you need by enabling it. And Ubuntu LTS doesn't go much farther ahead than base Debian. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] seralth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If you need to rely on back ports to have day to day function of HARDWARE. Then your OS is not suitable to your use case. Backport reliance should not be the norm for your avg user. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago I disagree, since this is why Backports was made. That being said, everyone is entitled to their opinion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) At that point why not just run a rolling release? Debians whole selling point is stability which backports kinda ruins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago I would argue that backporting one package does not ruin everything. If you backport a lot of stuff, then I would agree that it changing distrio to something more up-to-date should be considered because of the increase of potential problems. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 point 1 year ago A great way to brick your system and enter the package versionning conflict hell permalink fedilink source parent
[–] seralth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If you need to rely on back ports to have day to day function of HARDWARE. Then your OS is not suitable to your use case. Backport reliance should not be the norm for your avg user. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago I disagree, since this is why Backports was made. That being said, everyone is entitled to their opinion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago I disagree, since this is why Backports was made. That being said, everyone is entitled to their opinion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) At that point why not just run a rolling release? Debians whole selling point is stability which backports kinda ruins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago I would argue that backporting one package does not ruin everything. If you backport a lot of stuff, then I would agree that it changing distrio to something more up-to-date should be considered because of the increase of potential problems. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago I would argue that backporting one package does not ruin everything. If you backport a lot of stuff, then I would agree that it changing distrio to something more up-to-date should be considered because of the increase of potential problems. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 point 1 year ago A great way to brick your system and enter the package versionning conflict hell permalink fedilink source parent