1344
its even more outdated (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
409 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

I think images can be useful and even reactions when it's a (large) group chat. Haven't had anyone use them 1-1

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I've got a group chat going in SMS with several family members, and I always cringe when I get the message "[brother] laughed at an image," and I don't even know what fucking image it was because I don't have an iPhone.

    Reactions just seem like something that should have never been implemented in a place where they're not universally supported. Maybe I'd feel different with Signal, since I could simply not pay any attention to them. But if someone can't simply have the time to say "I like that," then why even react at all? I don't need to know that you lived, laughed, loved at my image.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think it's less annoying with a large group chat to have people react to an image than 20 identical messages. I've seen some do group votes through that (👍 vs 👎) which seems like a good use case. Tbh I haven't seen people use reactions much so probably partly because of that they don't bother me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    I guess it would be preferable to getting all the disembodied "x laughed at an image" or "x loved an image" messages without even knowing which image it refers to. One could simply ignore the feature if it were less intrusive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent